INside Performance Marketing
Top 50 Industry Players from 2017
Eye Testing Draws Clear Verdict on Native and Banner Ad Battle
Image Credit  Mario Cutroneo Creative Commons license

Eye Testing Draws Clear Verdict on Native and Banner Ad Battle


A ‘first-of-its-kind’ study into the effectiveness of online banner ads and their impact on the human brain has been released - with some striking conclusions.

A so-called “neuroscience perspective” on banner ads - a huge part of display advertising - has highlighted their failure to outperform native ads in terms of reader attention. 

Conducted by sharethrough and Nielsen, notes from the study and its corresponding infographic show that banners receive “little-to-no” focus on the text, meaning they are mainly in the reader’s peripheral vision.

Native ads, on the other hand, are being delivered directly in-feed and designed as to seem cohesive with the content they’re paired with.

A second eye-tracking map shows the viewer applying “direct visual focus” to a native ad which makes its way into the bottom of the screen.

The study saw testing on over 350 consumers, with the results appearing to support the verdict of other attempts to pit banner ads against their native counterparts. 

One test, a survey of 4,770 consumers last year by IPG Media Lab, saw native ads driving 52% more “visual focus” than banners. 

Other readings from the same piece of research saw native outperforming banners in terms of brand recall, reputation and purchase intent. 

Continue the conversation

Got a question or comment – tweet Richard @RichToweyPI or comment on Twitter, Facebook or LinkedIN.

Richard Towey

Richard Towey

Richard is a former head of content at PerformanceIN. After many years spent covering developments from the automotive, sports, travel and finance sectors, he eventually turned his full attention to reporting on stories from the fast-evolving world of digital marketing. 

Read more from Richard

You may also like…